The Official Forum

The Official Forum (https://forum.officiating.com/)
-   Baseball (https://forum.officiating.com/baseball/)
-   -   Swinging 3rd Strike Call (https://forum.officiating.com/baseball/26743-swinging-3rd-strike-call.html)

nickrego Fri May 26, 2006 11:03am

Swinging 3rd Strike Call
 
Do you say, "Out" on a Swinging 3rd Strike that is caught ?

blueump Fri May 26, 2006 11:27am

Usually, there is no need to say anything. I just point for the swing and show the hammer.

If there is a question on whether he swung, I again point, verbalize "Yes he did!" and again show the hammer.

I learned long ago that the minute you get into the habit of verbalizing "strike out" or something like that, that's the time that the catcher will drop the ball.

The only time I will verbalize "Out" on a swing is if the catcher drops the ball (or the pitch bounces) and first base is already occupied. Then its a loud, "The batter is out!", especially if they take off for first base.

NIump50 Fri May 26, 2006 11:53am

Quote:

Originally Posted by nickrego
Do you say, "Out" on a Swinging 3rd Strike that is caught ?

I don't, unless it's low and questionable and then I verbalize.

Interesting dropped third happened to me last week.
Varsity game
2 out bases empty 2-2 count.
F2 set up to outside, pitch comes in down the middle knee high tailing to inside. strike 3. Ball goes off F2s glove, (don't ask me why, he was a good catcher) hits my shin gaurd.
As the ball crosses the plate I know it's a strike, as the ball carems off the catchers mitt I'm thinking punch out, but now it's dropped and I have to get out of the way. As I'm dancing out of the way of the catcher I verbalize plenty loud for catcher and batter to hear "STRIKE" but I don't give strike mechanic. Batter plays statue for about 2 seconds, F2 is hustling to retrieve ball. BR then breaks for 1st and is promptly thrown out.
Off. coach comes to me and says I screwed up and did not indicate strike. I say I verbalized loud enough for batter and catcher to hear. He says yea but I didn't hear. I say you don't need to. and he says sure i do, I have to know so I can tell my batter to run.
What a perfect set-up he gave me. But I maintained control and to keep from letting him see me laugh I just turned and walked away.

left coast Fri May 26, 2006 12:52pm

Quote:

Originally Posted by NIump50
I don't, unless it's low and questionable and then I verbalize.

Interesting dropped third happened to me last week.
Varsity game
2 out bases empty 2-2 count.
F2 set up to outside, pitch comes in down the middle knee high tailing to inside. strike 3. Ball goes off F2s glove, (don't ask me why, he was a good catcher) hits my shin gaurd.
As the ball crosses the plate I know it's a strike, as the ball carems off the catchers mitt I'm thinking punch out, but now it's dropped and I have to get out of the way. As I'm dancing out of the way of the catcher I verbalize plenty loud for catcher and batter to hear "STRIKE" but I don't give strike mechanic. Batter plays statue for about 2 seconds, F2 is hustling to retrieve ball. BR then breaks for 1st and is promptly thrown out.
Off. coach comes to me and says I screwed up and did not indicate strike. I say I verbalized loud enough for batter and catcher to hear. He says yea but I didn't hear. I say you don't need to. and he says sure i do, I have to know so I can tell my batter to run.
What a perfect set-up he gave me. But I maintained control and to keep from letting him see me laugh I just turned and walked away.

There may be some around here who believe: The STRIKE ZONE is that area over home plate the upper limit of which is a horizontal line at the midpoint between the top of the shoulders and the top of the uniform pants, and the lower level is a line at the hollow beneath the knee cap. The Strike Zone shall be determined from the batter's stance as the batter is prepared to swing at a pitched ball. (OBR) With that in mind, any pitch that crosses that area at any time should be called a strike.

I have a hard time calling a strike (especially strike three) on a pitch that hits me in the shin guards and the catcher has to run to the backstop to get. That pitch should be called to reflect what it looks like.

TussAgee11 Fri May 26, 2006 01:05pm

I only say out on a Called Strike 3.

Swinging... its hand out to the side (strike 3) then a fist close to my chest.

BigUmp56 Fri May 26, 2006 01:47pm

Is there any way to find out who the three umpires were that voted to verbalize "out" on a swinging strike three? Seems we have a few members who need to understand why it's a poor mechanic.



Tim.

NIump50 Fri May 26, 2006 02:05pm

Quote:

Originally Posted by left coast
I have a hard time calling a strike (especially strike three) on a pitch that hits me in the shin guards and the catcher has to run to the backstop to get. That pitch should be called to reflect what it looks like.


I don't know about you, but I'm watching the ball, not the catchers form.

I personnally am looking for strikes so all things being equal, if the ball is in the strike zone that's what I'm calling. Good technique by the catcher simply allows me to steal a few strikes.

pdxblue Fri May 26, 2006 02:06pm

Quote:

Originally Posted by left coast
There may be some around here who believe: The STRIKE ZONE is that area over home plate the upper limit of which is a horizontal line at the midpoint between the top of the shoulders and the top of the uniform pants, and the lower level is a line at the hollow beneath the knee cap. The Strike Zone shall be determined from the batter's stance as the batter is prepared to swing at a pitched ball. (OBR) With that in mind, any pitch that crosses that area at any time should be called a strike.

I have a hard time calling a strike (especially strike three) on a pitch that hits me in the shin guards and the catcher has to run to the backstop to get. That pitch should be called to reflect what it looks like.

I couldn't agree more.

BlueLawyer Fri May 26, 2006 02:13pm

Two times I say something on a swinging strike
 
1. Half/check swing, no matter what the count: "Yes, he did!" pointing first at the batter and then giving my swinging strike mechanic.

2. Droppped third strike with fewer than two out and first base occupied: "The batter's out! HE'S OUT! First base was occupied at the time of the pitch!" This depends, somewhat on the level of ball I'm calling- I expect varsity high school and Legion to know the rule. Then again, I or my partner wind up having to take some kid off first quite often, even in those games.

Strikes and outs!

SanDiegoSteve Fri May 26, 2006 03:01pm

Quote:

Originally Posted by BigUmp56
Is there any way to find out who the three umpires were that voted to verbalize "out" on a swinging strike three? Seems we have a few members who need to understand why it's a poor mechanic.

Tim,

You can find out by clicking on the poll result numbers, i.e. the "3" for the 3 voters who voted to verbalize.

While I voted not to verbalize, there is one exception. On obvious swinging 3rd strikes, no verbal. When it is questionable to the participants whether or not the pitch hits the ground, and it is unclear, I will nonchalantly say "he's out" in a conversational tone. No big production, just enough to prevent any unnecessary problems. I do the same thing when 1st base occupied with less than two outs and an uncaught 3rd strike. Just a "batter's out" is preventative officiating.

mcrowder Fri May 26, 2006 03:15pm

Quote:

Originally Posted by left coast
I have a hard time calling a strike (especially strike three) on a pitch that hits me in the shin guards and the catcher has to run to the backstop to get. That pitch should be called to reflect what it looks like.

You and PDX are either idiots (and from other things I read, I doubt this is the case), or are completely or deliberately misunderstanding the sitch posted that got you to respond.

The ball didn't go directly from pitcher, through the zone, to the shinguards. It hit the mitt first. A pitch could be a cockshot and for some reason the catcher flubs it and it hits your shin - you gonna call this a ball?

rookieblue Fri May 26, 2006 03:20pm

pdx,

You quote, with approbation, leftcoast:

Quote:

I have a hard time calling a strike (especially strike three) on a pitch that hits me in the shin guards and the catcher has to run to the backstop to get. That pitch should be called to reflect what it looks like.
No quarrel there, but is there a distinction between making the "expected call" on a ball/strike, versus making the "expected call" on safe/out? It seems one may be permissible, while the other is a question of integrity.

I'm not attempting to be a wise-guy, although I may be doing a good job of it! I'm just learning my way, as the name and post count indicate.

Thanks, all, for a tremendous web site.

Bob James
Virginia

Grateful prayers for the repose of all those heroes who gave this nation the last full measure of devotion.

NIump50 Fri May 26, 2006 03:28pm

Quote:

Originally Posted by rookieblue
pdx,

You quote, with approbation, leftcoast:



No quarrel there, but is there a distinction between making the "expected call" on a ball/strike, versus making the "expected call" on safe/out? It seems one may be permissible, while the other is a question of integrity.

I'm not attempting to be a wise-guy, although I may be doing a good job of it! I'm just learning my way, as the name and post count indicate.

Thanks, all, for a tremendous web site.

Bob James
Virginia

Grateful prayers for the repose of all those heroes who gave this nation the last full measure of devotion.

Great catch Rook!!

LMan Fri May 26, 2006 03:48pm

Quote:

Originally Posted by left coast

I have a hard time calling a strike (especially strike three) on a pitch that hits me in the shin guards and the catcher has to run to the backstop to get. That pitch should be called to reflect what it looks like.


Ummmm, interesting philosophy, but that's not the sitch here. It clearly says 'a 3d strike that is caught' :rolleyes: :D

SanDiegoSteve Fri May 26, 2006 03:52pm

Quote:

Originally Posted by mcrowder
You and PDX are either idiots (and from other things I read, I doubt this is the case), or are completely or deliberately misunderstanding the sitch posted that got you to respond.

The ball didn't go directly from pitcher, through the zone, to the shinguards. It hit the mitt first. A pitch could be a cockshot and for some reason the catcher flubs it and it hits your shin - you gonna call this a ball?

I'm not going to call a cockshot a ball unless the catcher completely bails out and lets me catch it. But pitches that are on the extreme edges of the zone should be stuck by the catcher to get those calls. Their coaches will even tell them that that's why the umpire didn't call it a strike. "Catch that and it's a strike, meat!" or words to that effect are often heard from the dugout.

BigUmp56 Fri May 26, 2006 03:58pm

I couldn't agree more. How the catcher handles those borderline pitches is a critical factor in helping me define my zone.


Tim.

BigUmp56 Fri May 26, 2006 04:00pm

This thread's been up for the better part of the day and I've yet to hear anyone try to explain why we don't verbalize "out" on a routine swinging strike three.


Tim.

SanDiegoSteve Fri May 26, 2006 04:05pm

Quote:

Originally Posted by BigUmp56
This thread's been up for the better part of the day and I've yet to hear anyone try to explain why we don't verbalize "out" on a routine swinging strike three.

Well, what are you waiting for?:confused: I'm sure you're just dying to tell us!

bossman72 Fri May 26, 2006 04:11pm

Yes Tim, please enlighten us.

I have a person i work with all the time that says "Strike 3 batter's out!" all the time and it annoys the heck out of me.

Lay the reasons down on us so i know what to tell him to stop him from doing it! haha

NIump50 Fri May 26, 2006 04:16pm

Quote:

Originally Posted by SanDiegoSteve
I'm not going to call a cockshot a ball unless the catcher completely bails out and lets me catch it. But pitches that are on the extreme edges of the zone should be stuck by the catcher to get those calls. Their coaches will even tell them that that's why the umpire didn't call it a strike. "Catch that and it's a strike, meat!" or words to that effect are often heard from the dugout.

If reds on black or top on bottom I prefer the catcher to stick it
but if it's inside of that it's a strike regardless of what the catcher does.

SanDiegoSteve Fri May 26, 2006 04:23pm

Quote:

Originally Posted by NIump50
If reds on black or top on bottom I prefer the catcher to stick it
but if it's inside of that it's a strike regardless of what the catcher does.

Agreed.

http://smileys.smileycentral.com/cat/8/8_13_6.gifhttp://smileys.smileycentral.com/cat/8/8_13_100.gif

BigUmp56 Fri May 26, 2006 05:22pm

Quote:

Originally Posted by bossman72
Yes Tim, please enlighten us.

I have a person i work with all the time that says "Strike 3 batter's out!" all the time and it annoys the heck out of me.

Lay the reasons down on us so i know what to tell him to stop him from doing it! haha

It's been ingrained into me that we don't verbalize the obvious. Think about it. He just went down swinging. He knows it, his teamates know it, the defense knows it, and if the fans are paying any kind of attention they know it too. I also feel there is an element of showing the player up when he goes down swinging.

This is like screaming "foul ball" when a ball is hit straight back over the backstop. It's kind of a pointless exercise.


Tim.

Carbide Keyman Fri May 26, 2006 05:49pm

I beg to disagree .......................
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by BigUmp56
It's been ingrained into me that we don't verbalize the obvious. Think about it. He just went down swinging. He knows it, his teamates know it, the defense knows it, and if the fans are paying any kind of attention they know it too. I also feel there is an element of showing the player up when he goes down swinging.

This is like screaming "foul ball" when a ball is hit straight back over the backstop. It's kind of a pointless exercise.


Tim.


I have had several batters this season get back into the batter's box after what I consider an obvious "Strike Three". So, I have taken to quietly verbalizing "You're Out". I don't like it, but it has moved the batters along.


Doug

SanDiegoSteve Fri May 26, 2006 06:21pm

Yes, at the lower levels they sometimes think they get 4 strikes! The same thing happens to me. I usually look at them and say "that's 3, man!"

BigUmp56 Fri May 26, 2006 06:25pm

Quote:

Originally Posted by Carbide Keyman
I have had several batters this season get back into the batter's box after what I consider an obvious "Strike Three". So, I have taken to quietly verbalizing "You're Out". I don't like it, but it has moved the batters along.


Doug

Doug:

Do you do it only when they're trying to step back in after strike three? I think thats alright. What I'm talking about is loudly verbalizing "out" like you're ringing him up.



Tim.

Justme Fri May 26, 2006 06:31pm

Quote:

Originally Posted by SanDiegoSteve
......... But pitches that are on the extreme edges of the zone should be stuck by the catcher to get those calls. Their coaches will even tell them that that's why the umpire didn't call it a strike. "Catch that and it's a strike, meat!" or words to that effect are often heard from the dugout.

That's right. I want to give you the strike, help me by doing a good job of catching the pitch.:D

bossman72 Fri May 26, 2006 07:00pm

Quote:

Originally Posted by BigUmp56
It's been ingrained into me that we don't verbalize the obvious. Think about it. He just went down swinging. He knows it, his teamates know it, the defense knows it, and if the fans are paying any kind of attention they know it too. I also feel there is an element of showing the player up when he goes down swinging.

This is like screaming "foul ball" when a ball is hit straight back over the backstop. It's kind of a pointless exercise.


Tim.

Right. The guy i work with seems to think that there's a difference between "strike 3" (uncaught) and "strike 3 - batter's out" (caught). He does that to differentiate between the two.

I don't like it, but i don't know what to tell him to change it other than "it's not the proper mechanic."

LakeErieUmp Fri May 26, 2006 08:34pm

I don't verbalize "you're out" for the same reason I don't say "take your base" on ball four. There aren't all that many things a palyer is expected to know, but the number of strikes you get is certainly one of them. But then again, I don't go all acrobatic on a swinging strike three as I see too many times.

BigUmp56 Fri May 26, 2006 09:20pm

Quote:

Originally Posted by LakeErieUmp
I don't verbalize "you're out" for the same reason I don't say "take your base" on ball four. There aren't all that many things a palyer is expected to know, but the number of strikes you get is certainly one of them. But then again, I don't go all acrobatic on a swinging strike three as I see too many times.


I agree. Pulling the chain on a batter on a routine swing strike three smacks of pure Smittyism.


Tim.

nickrego Sat May 27, 2006 12:51am

Quote:

Originally Posted by mcrowder
You and PDX are either idiots (and from other things I read, I doubt this is the case), or are completely or deliberately misunderstanding the sitch posted that got you to respond.

The ball didn't go directly from pitcher, through the zone, to the shinguards. It hit the mitt first. A pitch could be a cockshot and for some reason the catcher flubs it and it hits your shin - you gonna call this a ball?

Either way, it's very difficult, for an experienced pitch caller, to call a ball on the ground a strike. Especially when the catcher had to reach for it. (Catcher set up outside, ball tails inside, per original post)

BALL

SanDiegoSteve Sat May 27, 2006 12:59am

Quote:

Originally Posted by BigUmp56
I agree. Pulling the chain on a batter on a routine swing strike three smacks of pure Smittyism.


Tim.

Yeah, like the goof they had playing the plate umpire in Major League in the AL Championship final game. What a maroon!:eek:

NFump Sat May 27, 2006 01:00am

What a maroon!:eek: Hey! That's my line!

SanDiegoSteve Sat May 27, 2006 01:04am

Actually, it is Bugs Bunny's line!

NFump Sat May 27, 2006 01:11am

I knew I got that from a good source!

left coast Sat May 27, 2006 09:42am

Quote:

Originally Posted by LMan
Ummmm, interesting philosophy, but that's not the sitch here. It clearly says 'a 3d strike that is caught' :rolleyes: :D

Go back and read the post by NIump50.

LMan Sat May 27, 2006 03:20pm

Quote:

Originally Posted by Carbide Keyman
I have had several batters this season get back into the batter's box after what I consider an obvious "Strike Three". So, I have taken to quietly verbalizing "You're Out". I don't like it, but it has moved the batters along.


Doug

What do you mean? They swing at strike three, and then get back into the box? :confused:

Id advise not changing good mechanics to suit idiot or clueless batters...

LMan Sat May 27, 2006 03:21pm

Quote:

Originally Posted by left coast
Go back and read the post by NIump50.


ok, a multiple thread hijack :D

SanDiegoSteve Sat May 27, 2006 04:34pm

Quote:

Originally Posted by LMan
What do you mean? They swing at strike three, and then get back into the box? :confused:

Id advise not changing good mechanics to suit idiot or clueless batters...

Yes, sometimes little Johnny is quite clueless, which is why I will say something pithy, such as, "you only get 3 in this league" or "that's 3!!!" rather than point out the fact that he's out. Usually at that point the light bulb above his head will come on and he will finally get it.
http://smileys.smileycentral.com/cat/18/18_7_12v.gif
THE VERBAL SWINGING STRIKE MECHANIC

bob jenkins Sat May 27, 2006 04:36pm

Quote:

Originally Posted by SanDiegoSteve
I'm not going to call a cockshot a ball unless the catcher completely bails out and lets me catch it. But pitches that are on the extreme edges of the zone should be stuck by the catcher to get those calls. Their coaches will even tell them that that's why the umpire didn't call it a strike. "Catch that and it's a strike, meat!" or words to that effect are often heard from the dugout.

Sometimes that's the coach's (nice) way of saying, "Call the pitch, not the catch, please."

SanDiegoSteve Sat May 27, 2006 04:44pm

Quote:

Originally Posted by bob jenkins
Sometimes that's the coach's (nice) way of saying, "Call the pitch, not the catch, please."

I've never had a coach ever ask why I didn't call a botched catch a strike yet, and if one ever does question it, I'll tell him it takes a catcher and a pitcher to make a strike.

I am talking about extreme borderline pitches which I was considering calling a strike, but the catcher made it look horrible and way off the plate. I just feel that the catcher should have made a better effort to help his pitcher.

jwwashburn Sun May 28, 2006 11:18pm

Quote:

Originally Posted by SanDiegoSteve
Tim,

You can find out by clicking on the poll result numbers, i.e. the "3" for the 3 voters who voted to verbalize.

While I voted not to verbalize, there is one exception. On obvious swinging 3rd strikes, no verbal. When it is questionable to the participants whether or not the pitch hits the ground, and it is unclear, I will nonchalantly say "he's out" in a conversational tone. No big production, just enough to prevent any unnecessary problems. I do the same thing when 1st base occupied with less than two outs and an uncaught 3rd strike. Just a "batter's out" is preventative officiating.

Exactly, Steve. If he is out and there is any question, what possible reason could anyone have for not saying out?

Joe


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 01:54pm.



Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.3.0 RC1