The Official Forum

The Official Forum (https://forum.officiating.com/)
-   Baseball (https://forum.officiating.com/baseball/)
-   -   check swing (https://forum.officiating.com/baseball/26526-check-swing.html)

yankeesfan Fri May 12, 2006 11:02pm

check swing
 
i seen this play happened in a college game and i was wondering what the fed rule is on this. there is a 3-2 count on the batter with 2 outs, men on 2nd and 3rd. the 3-2 pitch is called a ball on a check swing and the ball gets away from the catcher and goes to the backstop. the batter heads to first and all the runners move up. the catcher then asks for an appeal and the first base umpire calls it a swing for a third strike. the umpires got together and called the batter out and no run scored. this is hard for me to believe that it was called correctly, just doesn't seem right. what is the fed ruling on this?

ggk Fri May 12, 2006 11:07pm

how could they call him out?? doesn't make any difference whether it was a ball or strike (walk or K) - the results should be the same. BR on 1st and other runners advance.

DG Fri May 12, 2006 11:10pm

Quote:

Originally Posted by yankeesfan
i seen this play happened in a college game and i was wondering what the fed rule is on this. there is a 3-2 count on the batter with 2 outs, men on 2nd and 3rd. the 3-2 pitch is called a ball on a check swing and the ball gets away from the catcher and goes to the backstop. the batter heads to first and all the runners move up. the catcher then asks for an appeal and the first base umpire calls it a swing for a third strike. the umpires got together and called the batter out and no run scored. this is hard for me to believe that it was called correctly, just doesn't seem right. what is the fed ruling on this?

This is missing one critical piece of information. Did the catcher retrieve the ball and throw it to F3 before the batter arrived at 1B? If so batter is out and inning over. If not then batter is safe and runner advances count. The way this is worded makes me think the batter was not thrown out, since the catcher would not be asking for check swing if batter had been thrown out.

Sounds like a bad call to me.

yankeesfan Fri May 12, 2006 11:10pm

Quote:

Originally Posted by ggk
how could they call him out?? doesn't make any difference whether it was a ball or strike (walk or K) - the results should be the same. BR on 1st and other runners advance.

i agree. they honestly called the batter out, defense ran off the field, and the coach went crazy. i have no idea what they were thinking.

yankeesfan Fri May 12, 2006 11:12pm

Quote:

Originally Posted by DG
This is missing one critical piece of information. Did the catcher retrieve the ball and throw it to F3 before the batter arrived at 1B? If so batter is out and inning over. If not then batter is safe and runner advances count. The way this is worded makes me think the batter was not thrown out, since the catcher would not be asking for check swing if batter had been thrown out.

Sounds like a bad call to me.

no, the catcher did not throw to first base. the batter made it easily to first, the ball went all the way to the backstop, no cance to throw out the batter.

DG Fri May 12, 2006 11:15pm

Quote:

Originally Posted by yankeesfan
no, the catcher did not throw to first base. the batter made it easily to first, the ball went all the way to the backstop, no chance to throw out the batter.

Bad call. And the umpires conferred. Amazing!

3appleshigh Sat May 13, 2006 01:24pm

I was most likely the SCAB Minor league umpires :cool: working the College games while on Strike. Had the Regular College umps been there they would have gotten it right. Gotta hate SCABS. :D :p

RPatrino Sat May 13, 2006 02:34pm

Apples, they aren't scabs, they are unemployed.

Bob P.

NIump50 Sat May 13, 2006 04:29pm

Quote:

Originally Posted by RPatrino
Apples, they aren't scabs, they are unemployed.

Bob P.

If they are unemployed they're not very ambitious.

left coast Sat May 13, 2006 05:19pm

Quote:

Originally Posted by NIump50
If they are unemployed they're not very ambitious.

They may not be ambitious now......just wait until the summer college wood bat leagues start. They will be lining up to work and take games from college umpires.

NIump50 Sat May 13, 2006 05:39pm

Rookies on strike
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by left coast
They may not be ambitious now......just wa
it until the summer college wood bat leagues start. They will be lining up to work and take games from college umpires.

Then the college umps will be taking High School summer games, HS umps will take the travel games, 2nd and 3rd year guys will take LL and the rookies will be on strike.
Support the Rookies!!!

Wait, will that make us all scabs or none of us scabs?
hmmmmm

It matters not
I'll follow the lead of my professional MiLB brothers, if they stand in solidarity with the rookies, gosh darn it so will I.

SAump Sat May 13, 2006 07:44pm

Ambitious
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by NIump50
If they are unemployed they're not very ambitious.

Most still live at home with mom and dad footing the bills.

DG Sat May 13, 2006 08:12pm

Please stop feeding the animals...


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 01:09pm.



Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.3.0 RC1