![]() |
Fact Vs. Fiction
NONE and I repeat NONE of the 2006 PBUC grads are working as Scabs!
There are a couple of guys who went to umpire school and washed out (literally did not attend enough classes to graduate and got certificates of "participation" instead) who have chosen to Scab. WhatWuz again decided to spread misinformation regarding these facts, hope this clears things up. |
Quote:
This individual cannot tell the truth about his own life and his own experience. Why would you believe him on anything he says about this issue? Peace |
Quote:
|
i sure will sleep better after knowing these two things have been cleared up...
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
Peace |
I apologize for not being an internet umpire like you Rut.http://smileys.smileycentral.com/cat/11/11_12_1.gif
|
Quote:
I use my real name, tell real stories that others that were present can verify and I am not asking a person that lives half way across the country a question about an issue that will never affect me. I think none of the above applies to you in any way shape or form. Now who is the internet umpire? Now you are taking up for a person that has obviously lied about resume, situations that involve me and other people and I am the internet umpire? Ask Windbag what conference he works then get back to me about who is evasive and truthful. Peace |
I didn't ask Windy about his conference. He has admitted that his best years are behind him now.
I did (and so did others) ask you a direct question, which you still have not answered. I really don't care that you haven't answered it, but I did call you out on it, and you did not answer the question. When you can't answer a question because you don't have an answer, just admit that you misspoke and be done with it. I would have dropped this immediately had you just done this when the question was asked. By the way, the question still is: What derogatory names (on the offensive level of the word 'scab') were leveled at the AMLU members by those with opposing points of view? You said there were examples of these insults, and we asked you to provide them. You have still not done that. Would you care to now? Please remember to only include examples which pre-date your original post. |
Here we go again...Windy vs. Rut
Accusations of using fake names, name calling, etc... That's exactly why I left the other umpire board. Can't you guys leave any of these instructional places alone? Get each other's e-mail address and flame in private please! PLEASE DONT RUIN THIS PLACE! |
Quote:
JRutledge did not "misspeak", he intentionally said something that was blatantly untrue for the purpose of making people look bad. Please do not give him the benefit of the doubt, he has shown quite emphatically that he does not deserve it. Joe |
Quote:
It was alleged that several 2006 Umpire School / PBUC graduates were working games. Jiggy answered to that point and I can validate his facts. |
Go ahead and ask Mick to remove this then...
I know of several recent graduates of the professional schools that were asked to work as replacements. My facts came from two instructors at one school and some guys veryclosetoFitz. So, your source is ??? Blueump, Rut is responsible for his own actions; baiting him is my fault and I apologize for taking advantage of those who are challenged. Becuase he can't correctly conclude my identity, he needs to take swipes and cast aspersions. It's okay, the more he talks his nonsense, the more I and others laugh. His very words are often his undoing, yet he has no sense of self preservation. I, on the other hand, have maintained for almost five years that my identity is irrelevant. By remaining anonymous (to Rut, at least) I accept no laurels and look to remain impartial. My name appears in dozens of box scores and it would be very easy to toss it out there and make him eat humble pie. The minute I do, he will run to his nearest coach/partner/language coach to learn of a play I kicked in 1984. Then he'll tout it is a chinque in my armor. He'll let it snowball until I'm soon responsible for the ozone breach, Bill Buckner's missed grounder and Rut's lot in life. No thanks, there are no enough clues out there over the years. My guess is that he would make a bad cryptographer. So, blueump, put your feet up and relax...I'll let him have the last word here and he'll tell you how wrong I am. Rut will say he's a real man because he uses his legal name. The resume under his signature may be gone, but not his desire for recognition. (Remember the tag: "Vindication, baby!" when he finally became a Certified umpire in Illinois? Any clown can become Certfied in six years if he knows what he is doing. 'Nuff said.) SDS is correct, my best years are behind me and I am not working any Minor League games this season. At least some members can read. |
You have the right to remain silent...
Quote:
The more you speak, the more you make yourself out to be a fool. Especially as it pertains to name dropping (Fitz). You continue to make it clear you don't actually know anything about what is going on and have no real "connections" in the game. |
Look who's talking about telling the truth
Quote:
|
Quote:
Peace |
Quote:
And even if they had, what is "dumb" compared to a vile, nauseating word like "scab?" Scab is on the level of, say, "scumbag," or "snotrag." Using the word in every sentence like they have been doing:mad: just makes me ill. Can you show me the same hostility from the anti-strikers? Hell no, you can't. Once again you have skirted the issue with illogical and false statements (unless you can actually produce one these supposed "inflammatory" comments, that is). |
Quote:
CHIRP CHIRP |
Are things heating up?
For your perusal:
By Baseball America Staff April 20, 2006 • Double-A Arkansas shortstop Brandon Wood hit two homers, but was more focused on a foul-tip call in the ninth inning of the Travelers' 8-6 loss to Tulsa on Wednesday. With a runner on second, Wood struck out to end the game on a pitch that he and Arkansas manager Ty Boykin argued was foul-tipped. Tulsa catcher Chris Ianetta dropped the ball, then tagged Wood and the game was over. "Yeah, I foul-tipped it," Wood told the Arkansas Democrat Gazette. Adding to that controversy was Wood's at-bat in the eighth, when Boykin--who was coaching third base--called for time to check if the white lettering on Tulsa reliever Josh Newman's glove was legal. The third-base umpire called time as Newman released the pitch, but the home-plate ump didn't acknowledge it. The called strike was allowed to stand after the umpires conferred, even though the home plate umpire apparently told Wood otherwise. "The thing that bothers me, which doesn't make any sense, the guy behind the plate tells Wood, 'That doesn't count.' Then he goes back up there and he goes, '0-1,' " Boykin told the paper. "I'm not bashing anybody. If you make a mistake, you make a mistake and it's going to happen. But I just can't deal with calls that are made that there's no rational reason behind it." Lost in all the debate was the performance of Tulsa first baseman Joe Koshansky, who went 4-for-4 with two homers and a pair of doubles. Koshansky, a sixth-round pick out of Virginia in 2004, is 8-for-17 (.470) in the series. The two teams meet again tonight as the Drillers have a chance to sweep the five-game series. • In other random replacement umpire complaints, the Colorado Springs Gazette ran a story today with some scathing comments from players: "We're only two weeks in and you can see how frustrating it's getting already. The players' jobs are on the line, and we're dealing with some umpires who have trouble at this level."--Triple-A Tucson lefthander Randy Choate. "We hold the players to a high standard. We have to hold the umpires to a high standard, too. Some of these calls they're missing are just obvious."--Triple-A Colorado Springs manager Tom Runnels. "The integrity of the game is being compromised, all so minor league baseball can squeeze some nickels and dimes out of the umpires. Minor league baseball ought to be ashamed at the product they're putting on the field. If there are good-faith negotiations going on, I don't need to be commenting in the press because it wouldn't be productive. But I understand there are no negotiations, and that's not fair to us."--Tucson righthander Kevin Jarvis. |
Did you parents not teach you "sticks and stones?"
Quote:
Now, I never used the word inflammatory as a tit for tat type of debate. I used the term to illustrate that there are bigger issues than the use of one word. Now Joe used the term inflammatory to tell all of us how smart he is and that we should not debate this issue with words that offend him (but he still stays in the debate :rolleyes:). I think Joe was being overly dramatic to get upset over a term that is not only used here, but is used on the AMLU website and other literature dealing with any union dispute if you actually do some research. If you go back and read the statements, you would realize that. As usual you read into the statements and then make a mountain out of a molehill. The word "dumb" that I referenced is my interpretation of the comments just like JoJo's comments about the term being inflammatory. I do not live in PC California where everything is offensive where everything said will offend someone. I live in the Midwest where people are rough and are used to hard times and had to deal with living in some tough conditions. The term "scab" might get more laughs here than where you live. One of the reasons the state and area I live in are union hotbeds where a lot of people belong to unions in many professions. I have seen people get upset all the time over a simple comment about race and it is common in my official's associations for people to tell racial jokes that deal with people's heritage and by into a lot of stereotypes. I am also not talking about Black and white jokes either. If being called a scumbag gets your panties in a bunch, then do not include me in that discussion of those being offended. You would have to say a hell of a lot more to me and many others that I run with to be offended by that term or anything like it. Now, if you do not want to have the discussion because someone uses a term that offends you, then leave the discussion. Just do not whine about it because things are going in a direction you do not like. Grow some sack man (I am sorry are you offended now?) Peace |
So that I have it straight, a team that is about to be swept in 5 is unhappy with the umpires. They are unhappy with everything probably.
And Colo Springs and Tucson, both of wich are at the bottom of their respective divisions and near the bottom in average attendance in the PCL are also not pleased with the umpiring. See a trend? |
Quote:
I have explained over and over and over that many people will not listen to a speaker who uses words like that. I have explained repeatedly that a respectful and reasoned argument would have more effect. Mr JRutledge, why do you continually say things that are not true? Joe |
Quote:
I have explained over and over and over that many people will not listen to a speaker who uses words like that. I have explained repeatedly that a respectful and reasoned argument would have more effect. Mr JRutledge, why do you continually say things that are not true? Joe |
Quote:
PWL, you are the example that I used, do to the offense you took by my innocent use of the word "retarded" to describe a bad baseball rule. Rutledge, I am not offended by any of those words, however I can understand why some would be. I have plenty sack, Jack, so jump back. Once again, you couldn't make it through an entire post without turning it personal against me. You still can't find any language which can compare with the word "scab" in any posts from the union opposition. Saying that the umpires would be smart to come back to work is not name calling. Find one quote, just one, and Joe and I will gladly drop it like it's hot. |
Foul Tip?
Quote:
How do you drop a foul tip???? :D Kyle |
Here are a few quick questions:
1. Do you think the minor league players, managers, and fans would rather not be playing right now, out of respect for the umpires? 2. Do you think they would rather say "no, we will sit out along side the umpires until they get what they want!!!!" ? 3. Or would they rather do as they are doing now, playing and enjoying their games and putting up with less than ideal umpiring, and not giving a faretheewell about the AMLU? (the correct answer is #3) |
I love the fact that without this strike only a few simpletons would ever give creedence to what a player or coach says. Being questioned by them at any level - especially after a game - is sad.
I have read countless threads that tell of a coach who blasts or praises an umpire. Most of us learned long ago that both comments mean the same thing - little. So far, all we keep seeing or arguments over the same things that they wrangled over before the strike. Strike zone consistency, foul balls and the like...wow, it'll be any day now that the cavalry comes in to save the day. |
Quote:
If this is not at all true, you sure keep trying to prove to me that no one on the opposite side of the union has said anything "inflammatory." Peace |
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 07:42am. |