The Official Forum  

Go Back   The Official Forum > Baseball
Register FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

 
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Rate Thread Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
  #37 (permalink)  
Old Tue Nov 08, 2005, 11:07am
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2000
Posts: 2,729
My True Answer,

WCB:

In an attempt to be part of the answer and not part of the problem I offer my view of your original post:

When I read your post I knew (contrary to your thoughts) that you were simply setting a situation that would lead to the end outcome. That is why I answered as I did . . . I respectfully request that you do not try to fill in what "I really meant".

Your situation must have rules for me to answer so here they are:

1) If I were in "A" with r1 then, for me, this could only be a Federation High School Playoff Game. That is the only "three man mechanic" games I work.

2) Since I work a rather "Deep A" with r1 I would have to first hear the entire conversation. I wouldn't "guess" what is being said or the motive behind the conversation.

3) So let's now all agree that the conversaion is EXACTLY as you portray it: "F3 is "encouraging r1 to run." IF I was interested enough to listen and decided that it wasn't in the spirit of FED sportsmanship rules I would simply step between the fielder and the runner, while touching the base (acting as if I am putting the base back into position) I would tell F3 to desist in no uncertain terms.

4) Since I am a veteran umpire I would say this to the level I was interested and to the level I thought important.

5) By injecting myself into the situation we are now in a position, and I hope you agree, that I am no longer worried about the "verbal obstruction" issue -- I am now directly involved so it elevates to an issue that if F3 says it again I have placed myself in a position that I must eject the perp.

This situation is FAR different than saying "Back!" by a middle infielder and should be handled differently.

Windy, I have plenty of resume fodder to convince even the most anal that I have a strong understanding of the letter and the intent of National Federation Rules . . . if pressed I would freely admit that I probably understand Fedlandia better than you after working it for 37 years and studying the processes they use.

Oh BTW, I would definitely call a guy out at the dish on an over the fence homerun if I saw him miss the plate by ANY measurement.

I notice that EVERY MLB umpire closely monitors all runners and the batter during a walk off home run and I do the same.

AND I believe in umpire's getting their own calls and living with them and an elimination of "group hug" umpiring. Let's get a little personal responsibility back into officiating.

Let's make umpiring a little less coach friendly and little more involved in getting our own calls and living with the outcome.

Thanks for reading,

Tee

 

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 04:08pm.



Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.3.0 RC1