The Official Forum

The Official Forum (https://forum.officiating.com/)
-   Baseball (https://forum.officiating.com/baseball/)
-   -   Trouble Ball (https://forum.officiating.com/baseball/2156-trouble-ball.html)

Jim Porter Sat Apr 14, 2001 10:19pm

Re:
 
Quote:

Originally posted by JRutledge
Personally, I really do not think saying "I've got the ball" is really necessary. I think if the BU turns their back, they are going and should remain out. The PU should already be half way up the line, and if you are doing your job, you just read what the BU does, then react accordingly. You should not be actually looking at the ball, you see what the fielders are doing. Because if anyone is going to catch the ball, it is going to be the fielders. The fielders are going to tell you where the ball is anyway.

I personally think saying "I've got the ball" just interferes with the fielders. They hear you say that, they might think it is one of their teammates and react accordingly. This might not be the popular way to do it, but if you have experience and know what you are looking for anyway, it is not what you say, it is what you do.

Just my two cents.

You are the first person I have ever heard discourage verbal communication with one's partner.

I doubt it would interfere with the fielders, since it is said by the umpire well before any fielder comes close to making a play.

I must agree with you on one point, though. When you've got two umpires who have been working together for a long time, and they are experienced, the verbal communication melts away. It becomes superfluous. You each know what the other is going to do on any given play.

But, if you're virtual strangers, it's always a good idea to communication verbally as often as needed, I think.

JRutledge Sun Apr 15, 2001 01:18am

Pros and Cons
 
Quote:

Originally posted by Jim Porter


You are the first person I have ever heard discourage verbal communication with one's partner.

I doubt it would interfere with the fielders, since it is said by the umpire well before any fielder comes close to making a play.

I must agree with you on one point, though. When you've got two umpires who have been working together for a long time, and they are experienced, the verbal communication melts away. It becomes superfluous. You each know what the other is going to do on any given play.

But, if you're virtual strangers, it's always a good idea to communication verbally as often as needed, I think.


I agree, experience has much to do with whether you say anything or not. But I feel that if the PU is already doing their job, you can tell if you have the ball by what the BU does. But also, the BU has to do their job and go all the way out in the outfield.

I did work with a couple of guys this year, that did not go all the way out and kind of stayed on the edge of the dirt, it was a little difficult to tell if they were making the call or I had the call. But this depends on the experience of your partners and if you have worked together or not. But communication in almost every other situation is always good. I do not want you or anyone think you should not communicate, it is just that with no one on, it can be easier to tell what is going on, then in the other situations.

But the most important thing, is what you talk about in your pregame. That sets the table of the actions during the game.


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 09:26am.



Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.3.0 RC1