Helmet v Mask

[officialtony]

Originally posted by 3appleshigh


". . . . must be hugely lopsided in favor of the hockey mask."

. . . there is 1 or 2 who have swiched back and about 4-5 who stuck with it.



HUGELY LOPSIDED ? ? ? ? ? ? ?


I look at " must be " as a synonym phrase for " has to be/have to be ". So when someone says " must be " I infer they are saying " has to be " hugely lopsided. Thus, the question " what facts support that statement ?" What you proposed above is neither fact nor " hugely lopsided ". That was my contention. It still is.
In offering an opinion, I respect your right to provide it. When one tries to support an opinion with " facts ", I like to know the facts before I consider changing my way of thinking. In your case, you offered an opinion, substantiated by alledged facts - which were not facts at all. My only point there.
So. . . . I still disagree with your thinking since you were unable to substantiate your statements of " fact ".

Also, It is better to take my time to do things right than to do things in a half ash manner - whether it is typing, offering opinions, or umpiring ( among a multitude of other tasks ). That is part of my style.

Remember, all herein is . . . . . . .

. . . . . . . . . . . . . . just my humble opinion.