Quote:
Originally posted by rex
Read 6.06(c) mostly the last paragraph before 6.06(d). You saw the play, so with the reading of the COMPLETE rule you'll be able to get the answer you want.
|
Rex,
Carl gave a more complete answer. I'm sure he did this knowing that Robert was talking about LL (11/12 yrs), and that the LL rule book does NOT include most of the casebook comments that we find in the standard OBR. The paragraph you referenced is a casebook comment. So, your admonition to read the last paragraph before OBR 6.06(d) might actually produce a different result depending on which copy of the rules Robert reads.
BTW, I don't see any Clampett/McCoy or even Hatfield/McCoy type fued in this thread. My response to Bfair (aka Steve Freix) was deliberately brief and to the point, because Steve has a tendency to pounce on every little phrase looking for arguments. In that sense you could say my curt post was an attempt to AVOID the Hatfield/McCoy outcome in this thread. Then along comes Rex to call a Hatfield a Clampett and .... (grin)
Cheers,
Warren
Thu Mar 15, 2001, 11:03pm
Threaded Mode
