Quote:
Originally posted by Gre144
Look at 8.4.1.g on page 51 of NFHS. On a third dropped strike I believe he does have to throw it.
Also in the NFHS Quarterly, your situation comes up in situation 21 page 29 and it says that the catcher must throw the ball in order for interference to be called. This seems to contradict what everyone is saying but I think that I am right if you go strictly by the rules.
[Edited by Gre144 on Mar 16th, 2001 at 12:25 AM]
|
Situation 21 seems to me to say just the opposite, GRE --"since the catcher did not
attempt to throw, there is no batter interference."
Fri Mar 16, 2001, 10:20am
Threaded Mode
