|
Thu Mar 24, 2005, 08:10am
|
|||
|
|||
|
And, then, there's also a misprint on the NFHS web-site. Interp #17 is the same play and indicates the move is legal.
It would be easy for the FED to issue a correction on the web-site -- if the ruling really is an error and not a suggested change for next year. Maybe your (jicecone)state interpreter can get the FED to do so. 
|
| Bookmarks |
|
|
Threaded Mode
