Quote:
Originally posted by bob jenkins
And, then, there's also a misprint on the NFHS web-site. Interp #17 is the same play and indicates the move is legal.
It would be easy for the FED to issue a correction on the web-site -- if the ruling really is an error and not a suggested change for next year. Maybe your (jicecone)state interpreter can get the FED to do so.
|
I would like to believe tbat it would most likely be handled this way however, Im just the messenger here, reporting the up to date news.
I personnaly don't know the gentlemen (State Interpretor), but I guess if the entire state enforces one ruling, then it is not all that bad. And for this case I don't believe many here can disagree.