The Official Forum

The Official Forum (https://forum.officiating.com/)
-   Baseball (https://forum.officiating.com/baseball/)
-   -   Now I think I've heard everything (https://forum.officiating.com/baseball/18802-now-i-think-ive-heard-everything.html)

jumpmaster Sat Mar 12, 2005 10:07am

Quote:

Originally posted by mikebran
Quote:

Originally posted by umpduck11

Second game of varsity doubleheader,Fed rules..

...Oh wait, it was the SECOND game of a doubleheader? Never mind then, I was going to say something really REALLY intelligent, but it would sound Stoopid now because it would only be appropriate if this was the FIRST game of a doubleheader, because everybody knows that the rules are different between games of a doubleheader....

Mike - step away from the coffee.

Lighten up man. If you are going to jump in someones stuff, do it about something that matters, not about someone including irrelevant information in a sitch. If jump on someone evertime they include useless information, you are going to get tired in a hurry. Besides, didn't you learn to ignore useless information in school? I did, and I graduated from a public school in Arkansas.

Tim C Sat Mar 12, 2005 10:17am

Well,
 
Contrary to the preponderence of my posts I follow the "Tony Peters" rules of discussion on the field:

Make every explanation in FIVE WORDS or less:

"He was making a play."

Turn with a little chuckle.

Rats, don't you love'em?


Largo20 Sat Jun 04, 2005 02:19am

Sorry for the late reply on this one.
Is it obstruction if runner and catcher collide at homeplate during a bang-bang play?
In this case, the man behind the dish would have a lot easier call to make.
That´s obstruction - Time - You: Home.

Rich Sat Jun 04, 2005 02:50pm

Quote:

Originally posted by Largo20
Sorry for the late reply on this one.
Is it obstruction if runner and catcher collide at homeplate during a bang-bang play?
In this case, the man behind the dish would have a lot easier call to make.
That´s obstruction - Time - You: Home.

Obstruction? The fielder had the ball. Besides, if this is a FED game, the fielder only needs to be making an imminent play on the ball, not actually have the ball.

The original play, as written, couldn't POSSIBLY be obstruction -- the fielder had the ball and can block anything he darn well pleases.

DownTownTonyBrown Sun Jun 05, 2005 01:22am

Coaches and lawyers
 
are like announcers?
;)

There's certainly some analogous logic in there somewhere!

Largo20 Sun Jun 05, 2005 01:26pm

Quote:

Originally posted by Rich Fronheiser
The original play, as written, couldn't POSSIBLY be obstruction -- the fielder had the ball and can block anything he darn well pleases. [/B]
I was pretty much aware of this. I just wanted to be sarcastic.

mcrowder Mon Jun 06, 2005 10:30am

Throw in a little smiley when you're sarcastic - I took you seriously too.


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 04:04pm.



Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.3.0 RC1