The Official Forum  

Go Back   The Official Forum > Baseball
Register FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

 
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Rate Thread Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
  #24 (permalink)  
Old Wed Feb 21, 2001, 01:53pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2000
Posts: 711
Send a message via ICQ to Jim Porter Send a message via Yahoo to Jim Porter
Mike,

I align myself with no group. I did not post the Jaksa/Roder entry, but I knew about it.

I think there has been positive input on both sides of this issue. I believe Warren has outlined all the exact reasons why we try like the Dickens to avoid a protest on our judgment. His advice should be followed.

I believe others have also provided good arguments as to why we should accept a protest if a manager perseveres before sending him to the parking lot.

What I was attempting to point out was that it is not a "must" accept situation. The rules are clear that we do not have to accept such protests on our judgment. But the advice from Jaksa/Roder, and other such sources (I believe Jim Evans is another,) is that discretion is the better part of valor. Don't chunk him, humor him.

Warren doesn't disagree with this notion. He agrees. What he disagrees with, and I do too, is that we are somehow bound by rule to accept frivilous protests. We are not.

That can be important. Sure, we humor the manager the first time around. But the second time and beyond, in order to keep control over the game, we should refuse his frivilous protest and put him out of our misery. Else, we'd be accepting frivilous protest after frivilous protest, and the game would be delayed, and the spectators would get ugly, and it would all end with some team deciding not to take the field in protest. That should be avoided.

Where I live, there's no such thing as a protest fee. I haven't had a single protest make it to committee in almost 21 years of umpiring. The few times the "P" word was used, I was able to end it right there on the spot. I think this issue is far less imortant than everyone is making it out to be in this thread.

After reading a good number of posts by so-called EWS members (what does that mean, anyhow?) and eUmpire.com writers like Warren, and Garth, somwhere along the line y'all stopped listening to each other and started talking past each other.

In my opinion, everyone needs to listen just a little more often.
__________________
Jim Porter
Reply With Quote
 

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 07:40pm.



Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.3.0 RC1