![]() |
|
|
|
|||
|
Quote:
*sigh* Obviously you didn't read OBR 4.19, did you Moose? "No protest shall ever be permitted on judgement decisions by the umpire...When ever a manager protests a game because of alleged misapplication of the rules the protest will not be recognized unless the umpires are notified at the time the play under protest occurs and before the next pitch is made or a runner retired." This passage clearly allows that protests: 1. Over judgement calls, or 2. That are not made because of alleged misapplication of rules, or 3. That are made too late, or 4. That are not properly notified under the rules, except on a game ending play,... ...will not be either permitted or recognized. Permitted by whom? Recognized by whom? Who is charged under OBR 9.01(b) to "...enforce all of these rules"? The UMPIRE is, Moose! Protests can ONLY be legally made over an alleged misapplication of the RULES, Moose. Otherwise the UMPIRE is charged with refusing to recognize or permit such a protest under the RULES, Moose! Try reading OBR 9.02(b) and you will discover the ONLY legal cause a manager has for protest. Tch, tch, tch. Curiouser and curiouser... Now I don't know what cockamamie ideas you will come up with about this issue, but they surely can't be any more idiotic than the ones you've so generously shared about the legality or illegality of changing judgement calls. All the same, give it your best shot! After all, once a proven idiot the only way left open is UP, Dude! Cheers, [Edited by Warren Willson on Feb 17th, 2001 at 05:43 PM] |
![]() |
| Bookmarks |
|
|