![]() |
|
|||
CC's list: Boy, we've certainly heard a lot about that in the last week. Most approve of my statement of those time-honored principles. Of course, there are the anti's, that small group of malcontents who always complain about anything signed by me. If I posted here that the sun rises generally in the east, there's some fool who would take issue.
I like that. It always adds to the import of my opinion when the same tiny group shows up time after time to say "nay." Frankly, every time one of those well-known rabble-rousers says Carls wrong, I sell another BRD. But let's get to the crux. No one has seriously argued that the five instances I've listed cannot be changed.
Right! Thus, we are at the heart of the disagreement; to wit, the plaint by the amateur umpire: I want to get the call right. Good: Quit umpiring today! You are not going to get all calls right. You cannot get all calls right. You should not get all calls right. The neo-romantics are lost in a dream world, a fantasy where they believe the adversaries respect right, truth, justice, and the American way. Santa Claus, Cinderella, The Never-Ending Story: "The kids deserve the right call, and Im gonna give it to them. Wrong! What people call Carls list is really Carls rendering of a list. You can find it iterated by Rich Marazzi, Tom Hammill, Scott Ehret, etc. Here, now, for the first time anywhere, Im going to give you Carls list of Calls That Cannot Be Changed.There are four:
You wont get all calls right.Nobody is perfect; everyone makes mistakes: clichés, of course. Heres another: All clichés are true. Get your own plays is the rulebooks admonition. What happens when you dont?Play 1: Ball beats the runner easily. Hes out. Play 2: Ball beats the runner by a nose. Hes out! Play 3: Bad throw maybe pulls F3 off the bag. Hes out. Get some help. The umpire asks his partner, and the call is reversed. Someone pointed out the inevitable outcome: Play 4: Ball beats the runner by a nose. Get some help. Illegally changing a call inevitably results in loss of umpire control. Call that loss of dignity, if you want. Whatever its called, it means that umpire is in trouble for the rest of that game. Where will it end? If you can be bullied into going for help on one play, why not on the next. And the next? You should not get all calls right.The umpire who illegally asks for assistance will forever appear inconsistent.We always wish we could take it back after weve made the wrong call. But when we know we nailed it, we are often eager to debate the merits of our decision. Thus, game participants see us belligerently defending a call and meekly taking back a call. To the untutored the calls look the same. Those who play the game and those who watch the game are entitled to your best efforts the first time. You cannot get all calls right.Changing calls on a continuing play would affect the outcome of subsequent play. That is, there is no convenient way to correct the mistake.The second baseman tags R1 (out 1) and throws to first (out two). Get some help. But how can you change the first out? If you had called safe, no one can know what the second basemans second play would have been. R2, 2 out, B1 is called out on a swipe tag at first. Get some help. OK, hes safe at first. But what will you do with R2? He went to the dugout. No, he stopped at third. No, he came on to the plate before time was called for the argument. No, he.... Before, after, and duringThe coach says, Go get some help. You can go to your partner to get help on a pulled foot or swipe tag (even a catch/no catch when you are screened) by asking before you make the call. The coach says, Go give some help. You can do that after the call, as we discussed in other threads, by alerting your partner to information he does not have.But theres one call that defies help; that is, the call that results from bad timing, specifically, a hurried call where the ball is dropped on a force or force-like play at first. Heres what I wrote last year in 51 Ways to Ruin a Baseball Game:
We roar our approval and then snicker at the outcome, for the ball popped out of the fielders mitt, and the umpire has now changed his call and signaled Safe, pointing sheepishly at the ball in the dirt. He might also be looking for a hole to jump into. Note: Strictly speaking, the umpire in [the play above] didnt change that call. He corrected it. That is, the umpire made his decision and almost immediately reversed himself. But the changed call is a dog on another hunt.... Briefly: You can always correct a call; you can change a call only in certain clearly defined instances. But most amateur umpires are so embarrassed when they screw up on their timing, they would rather involve their partners than immediately admit a mistake. Somehow, asking for Smittys help makes getting the call right all right. All wrong. Sometimes you can change a call; sometimes you cant. But you can always correct a call. Lah, me: Umpiring is really very easy, when you get right down to it. BTW: Three strikes is always an out, metaphorically. And its always a strike out. Its hard to imagine the kind of person whose mentality urges him to take issue with three strikes and youre out. Thats not nit-picking; thats just pique. [Edited by Carl Childress on Feb 8th, 2001 at 09:41 AM] |
Bookmarks |
|
|