![]() |
|
|||
Quote:
If you go poking around officiating.com a bit more, you'll find a bio on me too. As I said, the gutless one is the one who refuses to identify himself. p.s. (the edit) Don't forget that I never said it didn't exist, only that I'd never heard of it or seen it. While you're at it, copy a couple of pages of the red and green books illustrating where the rules are different. Thanks. BTW, didn't the Supremes just rule that a person who refuses to identify himself can be attested for it (interfering with governmental administration or some such)? [Edited by Rich Ives on Oct 1st, 2004 at 05:03 PM]
__________________
Rich Ives Different does not equate to wrong |
Bookmarks |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | Rate This Thread |
|
|