|
It seems to me like you made the right call. But it is one of those you had to be there plays. I say if the catcher bumped into the back of the batter, let it go. Neither one of them was near the ball, I say just let it go.
I think interference is protestable, but not in your case. Lets say R1, B1 hits towars F4, R1 kicks ball while it is about 10 feet in front of F4. Manager argues that it hit R1 before it passed an infielder and that F4 could have made a play on it. If the umpire agrees with the manager, but says that is not the rule, then I think that is protestable. But I'm not protest master, so I'm probally wrong.
|
Tue Jun 08, 2004, 09:36pm
Threaded Mode
