It must have been one hell of a discussion.

[GarthB]

Dave writes:

"If you criticize the behavior of someone you are known to be at odds with, but remain silent in the face of similar behavior by someone you are affiliated with, then the accusation that you are inconsistent in your response to bad behavior, or that your response is influenced by your bias for or against the person committing the bad behavior, is a reasonable, "in-bounds" observation."

This is the thrust of my point, Dave...Similar ACCORDING TO WHOM?
You? Steve? Rich? Warren?

You are assuming that your perception is THE perception and that I share it. Fatal flaw. You are now deciding to become the arbiter for the boards.

Forget the rest of your post, this is the entire thrust of the matter. You have no right to make that decision for me, or for anyone else. Period.