|
Mon May 24, 2004, 03:06pm
|
|||
|
|||
|
Defense got the out at 2nd so there was no interference. Why would you then penalize the offense and send the runner back to third when they did nothing wrong?
What you are miising is the rule pretty much states that if an out is recorded then interference couldn't have occured. That is they way I interpret the rule.
__________________
"Contact does not mean a foul, a foul means contact." -Me 
|
| Bookmarks |
|
|
Threaded Mode
