The Official Forum

The Official Forum (https://forum.officiating.com/)
-   Baseball (https://forum.officiating.com/baseball/)
-   -   Strike signals (https://forum.officiating.com/baseball/10824-strike-signals.html)

Dave Hensley Tue Nov 18, 2003 11:15pm

Quote:

Originally posted by IHSAIllini
Okay, I understand the theory - however, it IS still strike three, according to the rules? If so, why is the verbal "strike three" discouraged if it's different than "batter's out"?
Bluezebra either misspoke or is suffering a senior moment. There is no problem verbalizing "strike three" on a called strike three. "Batter's out" is what you don't want to say, simply because getting into that habit opens the door to your saying it out of habit but incorrectly in a situation when the batter is NOT out on strike three.

This is kind of deja vu, isn't it?

cowbyfan1 Wed Nov 19, 2003 05:46am

It's all about timing
 
Nothing wrong with giving the batters out when he/she is out along with the signal as well saying strike three or three but not "pumping" an out or saying out should be good enough for the realization that it is d3k. If an umpire has good timing then he/she should not get burned by saying batter out when that batter is out.

bluezebra Thu Nov 20, 2003 02:01am

Quote:

Originally posted by IHSAIllini
Okay, I understand the theory - however, it IS still strike three, according to the rules? If so, why is the verbal "strike three" discouraged if it's different than "batter's out"?
Who discourages saying, "Strike three"?

Bob

IHSAIllini Thu Nov 20, 2003 06:21pm

"The ONLY time to verbalize strike three"

I was referring to this by bluezebra, but I believe he meant "batter's out," which is what I do, so we're all in agreement!


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 06:29am.



Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.3.0 RC1