The Official Forum  

Go Back   The Official Forum > Baseball
Register FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

 
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Rating: Thread Rating: 3 votes, 3.67 average. Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
  #6 (permalink)  
Old Sun May 11, 2025, 09:28pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2018
Location: Rockville,MD
Posts: 1,183
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mark T. DeNucci, Sr. View Post
As one who has never shied away from quoting NCAA Men's/Women's Bkb., NBA/WNBA, and FIBA Rules when discussing Plays involving NFHS Bkb. Rules when they were germane to the Play. I am flummoxed as to why you would reference the MiLB/MLB/OBR Rule in this discussion.

MTD, Sr.
The OBR rule is similar to the NFHS rule, except that OBR requires a quality throw. If OBR says that the lane is to prevent interference with the fielder taking the throw, and NFHS does not explicitly provide for something explicitly different, such as the provision that malicious contact always supersedes obstruction, then OBR principles can reasonably apply to this situation too. UmpireBible does a good job comparing NFHS rules to OBR rules, which is helpful, because there is no way to publicly access the NFHS rules.

On throws from 3rd base (where F5 is playing), the runner's lane is not likely to come into play, because the likelihood of the BR interfering with F3 taking the throw is low. There might be a different situation on a bunt, where F5 is approaching home to field the bunt and has a throwing angle that is restricted similar to the angle that the catcher has, but in most situations, the batter-runner will not interfere with F5's throwing angle to 1st base. The batter runner is more likely to interfere with F2 or F1, because the batter and the throw will be coming from the same direction and a similar angle.

The lane does not apply in reverse, because the rule on the runner's lane exists for 1 specific purpose: to allow the 1st baseman to take throws unobstructed by the batter-runner. The double first base, where adopted, exists for a similar reason, to avoid collisions at 1st base when the 1st baseman is trying to field the throw and the batter-runner is trying to reach the base at the same time. Once the batter-runner safely attains 1st base, the colored base becomes irrelevant.

Intereference by the batter-runner on a backwards throw from 1st base to home plate can be addressed by the existing rules, so there is no reason for the runner's lane to apply to throws FROM 1st base.
Reply With Quote
 

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Running Lane / Interference sprivitor Softball 51 Thu Aug 07, 2008 07:50pm
Running Lane Interference Mike Walsh Baseball 13 Tue Dec 06, 2005 05:59pm
Running Lane - NFHS whiskers_ump Softball 15 Wed Mar 23, 2005 12:09pm
NFHS Interp. Running Lane gordon30307 Baseball 16 Sun Jan 23, 2005 03:01pm
running lane interference mrm21711 Baseball 21 Tue May 04, 2004 01:05pm


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 10:56pm.



Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.3.0 RC1