View Single Post
  #9 (permalink)  
Old Fri Feb 03, 2017, 01:01pm
JRutledge JRutledge is offline
Do not give a damn!!
 
Join Date: Jun 2000
Location: On the border
Posts: 30,556
Quote:
Originally Posted by bainsey View Post

To me, it's putting the ball-handler at a disadvantage by not having a patient whistle. If his RSBQ is compromised to the point where he can no longer effectively drive, then I believe a common foul is necessary, but other than that, I say "see it through."

And yet, I see others whistling during the drive, getting the common foul. Thoughts on this?
I am not going to "see it through" when the foul that took place prevents the player to do what they were trying to do. I think you call the foul when RSBQ is clearly influenced or the "automatics" take place. Because if you wait and there was clearly a foul before, the play still might not be completed. I would rather call the foul when it takes place.

Peace
__________________
Let us get into "Good Trouble."
-----------------------------------------------------------
Charles Michael “Mick” Chambers (1947-2010)
Reply With Quote