
Fri Feb 03, 2017, 12:30pm
|
Official Forum Member
|
|
Join Date: Dec 2015
Posts: 308
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by bainsey
I've been quiet in this forum this season, as I had leg surgery in September, and I'm inactive this year. Still attending some games, and I'd like some thoughts:
Am I the only one who doesn't like blowing the whistle for a common foul while a player is driving? I prefer to see if he can play through the contact, and if the contact remains upon the release, then call the foul.
To me, it's putting the ball-handler at a disadvantage by not having a patient whistle. If his RSBQ is compromised to the point where he can no longer effectively drive, then I believe a common foul is necessary, but other than that, I say "see it through."
And yet, I see others whistling during the drive, getting the common foul. Thoughts on this?
|
I'm with you and firmly believe in being patient. If you blow the whistle too early, you take a potential "and one" from the offense. Let them play it through and then decide on whether a foul call is needed. Late and correct is better than early and wrong. I'm intentionally slow/late on some of my calls in order to be patient and get it right. See the whole play.
|