
Thu Feb 02, 2017, 03:56pm
|
Official Forum Member
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2017
Posts: 275
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Bob Bball
Wow, you guys go to extremes. "The Knicks" That is a blast from the past!
The right call, at the right time, for the right reason! Adds to the game and officials who can do this are very valuable and work the the important games.
Officials who apply all the rules only by the book stay home on Saturday night.
Knowing and applying the rules to fit the game, is where the Art of Officiating begins.
Blowing the whistle because the book says so, shows you can read, it does not show you have the skill or talent to be an artist(official).
Was the call right by the book? Certainly.
Was it at the right time - player driving below the foul line going to shoot, NO it was not.
Was it for the right reason? By the book sure, in any comman sense why in what players were doing, NO.
I just happen to think there is value in applying the rules to fit the game. some of you think the value is in the rules, not there application and that is OK.
|
Like I said, eliminate judgement when you can. The best officials find balance between calling it by the book and adapting to the style of play. No doubt. Putting my personal belief of not awarding enough free throws and going looking for those types of fouls is not my style. The play we are debating is not even that bad; the T.V. commentator makes it worse than it really is. The biggest thing here is that a foul was called.
|