[QUOTE=crosscountry55;99870
The arguments from those saying this has to do with ball location, are not supported by rule. Basically I see many posters saying they'd call a violation because A2 was a knucklehead. That's not sufficient justification.
I know that I can deontologically explain my no-call to a coach a lot more easily than I could a violation in this case.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk[/QUOTE]
I think ball location rule makes perfect sense. It is in rule. Inbounds player reaches over and touches ball. Ball located where he is and still OOB.
We have the goofy play of thrower reaching over and touching the inbounds player. Violation. This action makes more sense as violation than that.
And if there is doubt, I will call something on the knucklehead every time or not call it to bail a knucklehead out.
Finally, if you use words like deont.......not sure anybody understand your explanation.
