Let's be honest, the chances of anyone staying on their feet in this case is slim to none. Debating whether or not this shooter would have stayed on their feet and a flagrant call is proper is pointless in this case. Show me a video of a shooter being pushed from behind while airborne and landing on their feet and let the debate begin.
I do not think hitting the wall is a factor here. Without the wall I would still call a flagrant.
Last edited by CJP; Thu Jan 26, 2017 at 05:21pm.
|