View Single Post
  #16 (permalink)  
Old Wed Jan 18, 2017, 02:16pm
jTheUmp jTheUmp is offline
TODO: creative title here
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Minneapolis, MN
Posts: 1,250
Quote:
Originally Posted by Whistles & Stripes View Post
I found the casebook play with the verbage that discusses this.

3.1.1 SITUATION:

After six players have been disqualified, Team A has only four who are eligible to continue in the game as players. In a gesture of fair play, the coach of Team B indicates a desire to withdraw a player so that each team will have four players on the court.

RULING: This is not permissible. Team B must have five players participating as long as it has that number available. If no substitute is available, a team must continue with fewer than five players. When only one player remains to participate, that team shall forfeit the game unless the referee believes this team still has an opportunity to win the game.
Ah, yes... I call it the "Hoosiers" ruling...
What the casebook doesn't say, of course, is that there's no requirement for the 5th player to actually have to participate in the game beyond being on the court.
"Coach, you have to have 5 players on the court, but you could just tell one of them to stand in the corner and not do anything"
Reply With Quote