Quote:
|
Originally posted by Josh Miller
|
Quote:
|
On the contrary, the deleted post quoted a part of Mr. Willson's post and dealt extensively with that issue. (We may be discussing a different post but I only remember one response.) As I recall, it was at least indirectly relevant to the thread in question since it quoted part of the post. But that is beside the point. Who appointed Mr Willson as the board censor? And since the post was deleted, the two of us are left debating a phantom post. It should have been up to the readership to decide the exact relevance.
|
We'll have to agree to disagree about the so-called context of that post. However, it is not beside the point. The forum policy gives everyone who initiates thread the ability and the right to deal with non-relevant posts as Mr. Willson did. You should address any concerns in that regard to Mr. Batt or Mr. Flores. If someone reacted to a thread of mine as happened to Warren's I would probably do the same.
To boil it down, all I expect to see when someone decide "to take someone else on" is a little sportsmanship or class. Relate the negative opinion to something other than personality. That poster was lacking in those areas.
Quote:
|
Mr. Willson tried to slip one by us and I have called him on it. It should be up to Brad or other management to police the site, not Mr. Willson and that is the only point I was trying to make.
|
Mr. Willson hardly slipped anything by anybody. And again, if you disagree with how the site is run, conatct Mr. Batt or Mr. flores.