Quote:
Originally Posted by Camron Rust
And why was that? Because it was considered a foul. Imagine that. Hmmm.
You've just confirmed what I've been saying.
|
So touching an opponent was a foul? Interesting. Seems like 4-27 said clearly otherwise.
And you still are not convincing anyone but yourself. And it appears again you were the only one in the country calling touching as a foul. Which is not even the current rule.
Peace