Tue Jan 02, 2001, 05:37pm
|
|
Official Forum Member
|
|
Join Date: Jun 2000
Location: Portland, Oregon
Posts: 9,466
|
|
Quote:
Originally posted by BktBallRef
Quote:
Originally posted by rainmaker
You're right abou the and/or thing, but why aren't all three of the criteria met? They couldn't have really been simultaneous, if you think about it cosmologically, so the FDF fits.
Besides there are no provisions in the rule book for Simultaneous Fouls. It's not dealt with at all so the FDF is the best choice from what's available, isn't it?
|
Actually it is dealt with. While there is no definition of simultaneous fouls, it is referenced under 6-3-3g.
|
WWOOWWWW!! I am humbled by your rule book prowess, and I will certainly bring any future questions here! (no sarcasm intended)
|