Just to clarify what Adam was clarifying about ODogs clarification of BNR's clarification of Nevada's comment on ODogs.....
Seriously, I have no idea who was saying what after all of that....but I think all were probably saying the same thing.
It IS a FDF both because the fouls were not at approximately the same time AND because it wasn't two opponents against each other. It only takes the absence of one to be a FDF but in this case, both elements of the double foul were absent, yet they occurred with no time having elapsed off the clock. The last point (the clock) is what leads to them being classified as a FDF instead of just two unrelated fouls.