Quote:
Originally Posted by BadNewsRef
Not necessarily. The first time Kaepernick "protested" (sat on the bench) nobody even knew he did it at the time, and he did not advertise it after the fact. Fans and the media are the ones who made a big deal about it days after the fact and brought it to the forefront, and then complained about the attention the subject was getting.
The gesture is against standing for the national anthem and honoring the flag for XYZ reason. I see it as less of a protest and more of a refusal to participate in a ritual or symbolic gesture they don't believe in.
Protests are not always designed to be "in your face". Often they are designed to create dialogue. An official refusing to participate in the national anthem proceedings would create dialogue amongst officials, and then branch out from there.
|
While a protest might not be in your face, the point of a protest is to make your point and draw attention to what you are protesting (
moderated). And thr NFL is noticing, if they will admit to it, that its fans are protesting their games on TV by not watching.