View Single Post
  #4 (permalink)  
Old Fri Oct 14, 2016, 11:31pm
"Lurker"77 "Lurker"77 is offline
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2016
Posts: 18
Quote:
Originally Posted by Tony.oe4 View Post
I can only share what my friend, the R2 told me. With all this being said, I still cannot find anything written that says a substitute must enter the court between the attack line and center line.
I think its supposed to be understood from the substitution zone definition, but I agree it's technically vague (again, in the outdated versions I had at hand). I would be fine as a participant with that being sufficient rules basis for an R1 or R2 to expect entry between the lines. And, as a coach, you want the typical habit to be in the center of the zone and cross the line there -- it may not be a requirement, but what's the downside or harm? Then, you are covered when you meet this particular breed of official.

Quote:
The R2 told me he was fine with this . . .
This seems like the bigger issue, if the R1 and R2 are interpreting the rules differently and working at cross purposes.

The R1's behavior does sound strange from the telling, but the team's inability to correct the behavior before a second (or more!) incident happened still makes me think there is something more to the story. After you see the delay card (fair or not), how hard an adjustment is that for a team to make?
Reply With Quote