View Single Post
  #9 (permalink)  
Old Thu Sep 29, 2016, 08:13am
crosscountry55 crosscountry55 is offline
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2014
Posts: 1,742
But the original rule change several years ago was specifically created to prevent the defense from receiving an unintended advantage by the action of kicking an AP throw-in. Perfectly logical.

So what possible impetus could NFHS have had to make this change? There was no chatter, no demand signal that I'm aware of, and certainly no comments or rationale regarding the tiny change that we wouldn't have even been aware of had it not been for one of our esteemed Forum members doing a word-for-word comparison between this year's and last year's books.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Reply With Quote