Quote:
Originally Posted by JRutledge
I love how when the conversation is about one topic, the NF is wrong, they have to change their wording, anyone who "disagrees with me" is wrong. But when it applies to something else, "The rules are clear" or "We do not need clarification because the interpretations apply."
Just funny how some people in this very thread act when it applies to other topics.
Peace
|
Assuming you're talking about the BC violation scenario, the difference is we can cite the rules and case plays that are in conflict with each other.
In this case, you've offering absolutely nothing in the rules or interpretations that support your contention. You just keep posting that we have ignored part of the penalty part of the equation, even though it's been shown that the ball is not always awarded in false foul situations.
But keep right on pushing the wrong ruling. We who have been here for years are used to you being wrong, and refusing to admit.
Done with this.