Quote:
Originally Posted by BktBallRef
No, just the opposite is true. When the rule is NOT clear, an interpretation is issued.
This rule is clear, whether you and johnnyd accept it or not. There's absolutely nothing in the rule book, case book or any interpretation that supports your contention that you do anything other than penalize the fouls in the order of occurrence
|
If you say so.
Again I will use the example again, we have a rule and a casebook on BC violations that many here have been complaining about for years that are very specific in both situations and people here complain that the NF needs to either change the wording or correct the interpretation (two of the most vocal people on those issues commented as if they are clear on this issue), but have the same problems in that case.
So something must not be clear if we are debating this here. We have been down this road before, just acknowledge there is an issue and we can move on.
Peace