View Single Post
  #14 (permalink)  
Old Mon Jun 20, 2016, 08:10pm
IRISHMAFIA IRISHMAFIA is offline
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2000
Location: USA
Posts: 14,565
Quote:
Originally Posted by chapmaja View Post
Agreed. From what I recall ASA considers the appeal of a force out a timing play.
That is not true. If the out effected was a force at the time of the appeal, it is still considered a force out.

Quote:
NFHS on the other hand considers the appeal of a force out to be a force out, thus negating any runs that score if the appealed force out is the 3rd out of the inning.
It is a matter of when the force is in effect, not that ASA ignores it.

Quote:

There was a case play IIRC (or maybe a test question), that read as follows:

R1 on 3rd, R2 on second, R1 on first, with 2 outs.
That R1 must be a helluva player

Quote:

B6 his a ball into the corner and advances all the way to home plate. R2 missed third base. The defense properly appealed the missed base.

Ruling: R2 is out on a force out, and no runs score.
Same for ASA & NFHS
__________________
The bat issue in softball is as much about liability, insurance and litigation as it is about competition, inflated egos and softball.
Reply With Quote