Quote:
Originally Posted by IRISHMAFIA
It is not incorrect. B1 is, by rule, the player officially in the game. I know this because the rule clearly states this to be true. The first sentence covers this in each scenario listed in the rule concerning unreported substitutes
Again, and I obviously cannot say this enough, the unreported substitute IS B1. The OP states " unreported substitute for B1 is batting". BY RULE, the unreported sub is in the game and now is considered B1.
This is not a NFHS test. For year, ASA's premise is to get the umpires' collective noses into the book and to think, not to try and make them fail.
Absolutely nothing wrong with the wording of this question. I understood it last year, I understand it this year and I would have understood it a decade ago even though the answer would have been different  |
You're not getting my point at all, or are so wrapped up in defending the technical correctness of it (did you write this question?) that you are ignoring my point. The question writer clearly makes a distinction between "B1" and "B1's substitute" everywhere except in answer a). Everywhere. Even when "B1" could have been used.
I don't take the ASA test, so there I have no skin in this game. It is sloppily written. That is all.