Thread: FT Violations
View Single Post
  #54 (permalink)  
Old Fri Apr 01, 2016, 04:07pm
BillyMac BillyMac is offline
Esteemed Forum Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Connecticut
Posts: 23,178
Just The Facts, Ma'am ...

Quote:
Originally Posted by crosscountry55 View Post
It was an IAABO-ism that was independent of the NFHS originally ...
It's true that IAABO was out of line pushing (it was none of their business, it's not their role) the "defender-over-the-free-throw-line" interpretation last year, when it wasn't in the NFHS rulebook (still isn't), and it wasn't even a NFHS point of emphasis (until this recent season).

That being said, the "original" rule was a NFHS rule, not involving IAABO, in any way, shape, or form, way back the last time (before this) that the rebounders were allowed in on the release (NFHS 1996-97). Maybe the NFHS, with a little help (push) from IAABO, figured that if the "defender-over-the-free-throw-line" rule was good enough nineteen years ago, then it was good enough for the latest reincarnation of the rebounders going in on the release.

Note: It's getting to the point where I can't keep track of how many times the NFHS has switched from hit to release, and vice versa, over the past thirty-five years.

https://youtu.be/QWkurH-MEtA
__________________
"For God so loved the world, that he gave his only begotten Son, that whosoever believeth in him should not perish, but have everlasting life." (John 3:16)

“I was in prison and you came to visit me.” (Matthew 25:36)

Last edited by BillyMac; Fri Apr 01, 2016 at 04:56pm.
Reply With Quote