Quote:
Originally posted by Back In The Saddle
Quote:
Originally posted by Damian
4-19 art. 4. Personal or technical of a violent or savage nature... or a technical noncontact file which displays unacceptable conduct. Also according to the quiz, coming in after being disqualified is a flagrent technical foul.
|
I'm a little unclear on what the point of the test question was. According to the exam, if a previously disqualified player returns to the game, it's a flagrant technical. Which is like a regular technical except that the offender is disqualified. So...their point is that the already disqualified player is now really, really disqualified? And I double dog dare you to try it again?
|
Technical fouls are composed of the regular variety,or they may be called intentional or flagrant.Regular and intentional technical fouls don't carry the penalty of mandatory ejection with them.Flagrant T's do.A lot of States track all flagrant fouls-personal or technical-and then mandate automatic suspensions for them.I think that this is the reason for distinguishing the type of technical to be issued in this specific case.It's for an extreme unsportsmanlike act.