View Single Post
  #20 (permalink)  
Old Sun Feb 28, 2016, 01:25pm
deecee deecee is offline
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: May 2005
Posts: 3,505
Quote:
Originally Posted by BryanV21 View Post
I guess it's like pornography...

I can't define it, but I know it when I see it.

If a coach or observer asked why it is/was a shooting foul, my response would be "in my judgment the player had started his shooting motion." Not "the" shooting motion, but "his" shooting motion. See 4-41-3... "the try starts when the player begins the motion which habitually precedes the release of the ball."

I suppose "habitually" could be based on a general idea of how a shot is attempted, and not for that particular shooter. I don't know, so all I can do is make the call based on my judgment.

Just another reason why our jobs can be so difficult. And until the NFHS gets more specific with their definition of shooting motion we're stuck with leaving ourselves open to ridicule and second-guessing.
In HS you are correct. In NCAAM you are not. All the interpretations I have come across has to do with the motion of the ball as the deciding factor whether a shot is being attempted or not. Eventually I think the rules committee will get this right and stop making it so damn complicated. I'm interested in their new rule next year, which wouldn't surprise me at all.
__________________
in OS I trust
Reply With Quote