Quote:
Originally Posted by CecilOne
R1 is out & ejected.
If the SS makes the play anyway and gets B2 out; then
- B2 gets a ball in the count and finishes batting
- the R1 out is removed, but a sub is needed to run for R1 at 2nd, then awarded 3rd.
If B2 is safe, B2 stays safe, and a sub is needed to run for R1 at 2nd, then awarded 3rd.
No guarantee for NCAA, but whatever rules I am working.
|
You are allowing continuing play after blatant and malicious interference? How do you support that?
I don't care which ruleset (and believe there is more to be said to each), but the DDB on the IP has to end when the runner commits interference.
As to the rest, here's some thoughts to consider with each ruleset.
Does/should the option to enforce the IP rather than the result of the play erase a malicious act along with the rest of the play?
Does interference supercede an IP (like it does obstruction)?