
Wed Feb 03, 2016, 01:59pm
|
 |
Get away from me, Steve.
|
|
Join Date: Aug 2000
Posts: 15,785
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by just another ref
The "loaded" question you speak of, for those who may not know, was this.
The subject line of the e-mail was Case book 4.19.8c. The question was: Some associates and I have discussed this case which involves two officials making conflicting calls on a block charge play at great length and still have disagreement about when both fouls must be reported and when one may defer to the other.
Her answer: If there are double whistles, the two officials should get together and discuss what was seen and which may have come first. In fact when there are two whistles the officials should immediately hold the signal for the infraction and have the discussion. If one defers to the other then the signal is given and the official moves to the table to report. If they cannot come to an agreement, then they rule a double foul and both players will report (it does not matter who reports first). Ruling a double foul on a block/charge would not be the thing to do.
|
Her answer says *nothing* about when one signals a block and one signals a PC -- it is clearly talking about 2 officials posting.
|