Quote:
Originally Posted by Nevadaref
1. What Rut wrote in his second post in this sequence is vastly different from what he said in the first one (quoted above by JetMet). In the first he wrote that he would just give the play to the offense which is in blatant disregard of the rule. His second post is reasonable in stating that the official did not deem (or perhaps did not see) the contact prior to the jump and catch as a rising to the level of a foul (I disagree and believe that it is a clear holding foul, but understand if the Lead couldn't see this from where he was.) and only thought that the body bump after the catch was worthy of a whistle.
|
Will you please get over yourself. Every time someone says something you disagree with you keep talking about disregarding a rule. I am so glad I never have to officiate with a guy like you that goes around telling everyone what they should do when you do not have any power to do so.
Good Lord man. We are talking about a philosophic which is referenced by everyone else but you for some strange and odd reason. Every single high level official I have talked to discusses these kinds of things often, but you keep complaining about how someone is not following a rule that you are not in a position to even say with any kind of authority in the first place. You do not work for the NF. You do not work the the NCAA. I wonder have you ever been to a high level camp where maybe one of the guys on the actual game might have actually attended to talk about what they do.
I also said there was contact, I did not suggest there was a foul. All contact is not a foul as you should know. And in my opinion the foul did not really occur until it was clear he was shooting. As someone else said, if he could not catch the pass, you might have had a different situation. But to me, when contact starts it might be a foul, but wait to see if they are really disadvantaged.
Peace