Quote:
Originally Posted by Camron Rust
Or the "two" actions were really one extended action.
It sounds to me like the push came before the whistle was sounded. If it was that quick, it could very well have been one act.
I think I'd have to see it to know if I'd consider it one act or two.
|
Agree -- this is being radically shaped by how people are picturing the play. My initial picture was a foul followed by a push because the player was still trying to get the ref to call the foul. That to me is just a common foul, followed by a nothing.
But if it's a more violent push or more clearly after play is stopped, the whole scenario changes radically and common foul plus tech makes a lot of sense.
Personally, I'm hard pressed to see an intentional foul here with a common foul occurring first.