Quote:
Originally Posted by Dad
I'm not sure you understood the question. He's debating common AND an intentional or common AND a tech. At least I hope this is the case. Calling a foul and then deciding not to because of an intentional foul after is poor officiating.
I'd have gone common and then a technical here. This kind of play after a foul call is a two and you're outa here. Depending on the shove I may just get rid of the player then and there, but it would have to be pretty bad.
|
How could he have a common and an intentional foul on the same player?
Sent from my SPH-L900 using Tapatalk