Quote:
Originally posted by Jurassic Referee
Quote:
|
Originally posted by Nevadaref
|
That has been my point all along. When we get into these debates on the rules I always argue based on what is written in the NFHS rules book, not what was meant, or was implied, or was left out, or is in the NCAA manual, etc.
[/B]
|
Nevada,would you care to enlighten me,as per your first statement above,exactly how you can make such a statement and then go and selectively call,or ignore,something like travelling?
[/B][/QUOTE]
Sure. In the statement above I wrote "these debates on the rules" because we are talking about what exactly the rules book says and how a question on a written NFHS exam would need to be answered. In the travelling play, we have moved onto the court and are discussing what to call and what not to call. Play selectivity as Chuck put it. I never said that the kid didn't travel or that what he did wasn't technically a violation; all I am saying is that I don't believe that he gained any advantage and so this is one of those plays that I am going to pass on.
So to me they are two different things entirely, or in your words, apples to oranges!