Quote:
Originally Posted by IRISHMAFIA
IMO, all this "projected sub" stuff with the Fed is more people not understanding, including the Fed coaches and committee, exactly what it is.
Of course, that doesn't mean it will stop them from wasting their, and the umpire's, time pushing something that doesn't need anything more than a viable definition and direction.
For the record, IMO the definition of a projected substitution in 48 years of umpiring as a change designated by the coach to take place at a time other than immediately.
And before someone brings up a defensive change, there is NO SUCH THING as a defensive substitution. Yes, the substitution may involve defensive positioning, but the change is ALWAYS to the line-up regardless of the defense positions involved.
|
An actual change to the lineup is a current change,
not projected, even if the replacement is not the immediate next batter; whether the team is offense or defense at the time.
I would have to go back to seem, but I remember the published definition as
being somewhat myopic and causing more problem than it saved.
