Quote:
Originally Posted by Adam
I'm all for discussing plays and seeing what we as a group could have done differently in most situations. However, once a coach assaults (or batters) an official in the course of a game, I'm no longer interested in reviewing any actions of that official in that game. Unless he physically threatened the coach, the only discussion is whether or not the charges will be upgraded to a felony.
Someone noted that it seems he's not filing charges. If that's the case, it is my only critique of the official.
If he "embellished" or fell "too easily," I don't give a crap. We aren't required to stay in the line of fire and "take it like a man".
I'd be shocked if this was the first incident where this guy lost his temper, and I'm guessing he knew as soon as he turned around that his career was over and that he may well have to call his lawyer.
|
I'm all for saying once someone has assaulted an official there's little use in critiquing judgement calls.
It is useful to examine referee assaults to see if we can identify anything we can do differently in similarly volatile situations to increase our safety.
The biggest point, as I said earlier, is recognize out-of-control people and stay away from them. Not because our proximity makes it okay for them to attack but because us being in the right doesn't stop us from getting seriously injured.