Quote:
Originally Posted by frezer11
Well ok then, like happens way too often on this forum, it seems we have to basically go to legal speak to explain a situation. Cameron says that I said it was OOB, then I said it wasn't. Nope. You are confusing the scenario with which I derived my question, with my actual question. So allow me to clarify for the few of you who may have been confused:
|
Just a suggestion: Look at your original post.
Quote:
|
For the sake of argument we'll assume that actions of the opposing coach (not necessarily motives) are legal, by which I mean the coach touched the ball when it was legally OOB.
|
1. We didn't write that, you did.
2. The line itself made any question from that point on moot since the ball was already OOB meaning there would be no reason to penalize the coach. If you presented it this way to an assignor or a rule interpreter they probably would have had the same reaction as Dad and Camron. We're officials. Being Type A is kind of what we do.
__________________
"Everyone has a purpose in life, even if it's only to serve as a bad example."
"If Opportunity knocks and he's not home, Opportunity waits..."
"Don't you have to be stupid somewhere else?" "Not until 4."
"The NCAA created this mess, so let them live with it." (JRutledge)
|