Thread: Interference??
View Single Post
  #22 (permalink)  
Old Tue Dec 29, 2015, 10:30am
Andy Andy is offline
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Glendale, AZ
Posts: 2,672
Quote:
Originally Posted by BlueDevilRef View Post
So, you are saying, by rule, that if a runner is forced out at 2nd and then just stops advancing or very slowly continues in base path and the ss fires to first and the runner is hit in the head by the ball, you got nothing?

I respectfully disagree. My belief in the rule is that her act is that she didn't act. A retired runner does not have a right to stand in the base path. And I've called this exactly never bc I've never seen it but I can say this, I used to do if when I played. I'm 6'5, 300lbs and when I remain in base path and lolly my way along after being put out, I was damn sure doing it to interfere with throw to first, so yes, it does happen.


I wish I had a cool signature
Both of these are acts of interference because the offense is no longer attempting to run the bases, they are "doing something" that could be considered interference.

A retired runner continuing to run at the same pace and on the same path is not committing an act of interference.

You keep changing the scenario to fit your view of the rule.....
__________________
It's what you learn after you think you know it all that's important!
Reply With Quote